All recent comments on applications from City of Ryde, NSW

It is apparent than the 50% site coverage has gone out the window with Ryde Council as this development site has a granny flat, new house and now a pool. At a guess I would reckon 80% coverage which is totally unfair to others who had to conform to 50%. Additionally, other than the nature strip, not a tree in sight.

I am writing to formally object to the Development Application LDA2024/0195 , which proposes the establishment of a childcare centre at 56 Rutledge St Eastwood NSW 2122. While I understand the growing demand for childcare facilities, I have serious concerns about the impact this development will have on the neighborhood.

My objections are based on the following points:

1. Traffic and Parking Concerns: The proposed development will likely lead to a significant increase in traffic and parking congestion in an area that already experiences challenges during peak times. This will not only affect local residents but also increase safety risks for children and pedestrians.
2. Noise and Disruption: The operation of a childcare centre will inevitably result in a high level of noise, particularly during outdoor playtimes. This may disrupt the peace and quiet that many residents, especially those working from home or retirees, currently enjoy.
3. Impact on Local Amenities and Infrastructure: The neighborhood’s infrastructure, including roads, utilities, and public spaces, is not designed to support the increased demand that a childcare facility would bring. I am concerned about the strain this development will place on existing resources.
4. Suitability of the Location: The proposed site may not be suitable for a childcare facility due to its proximity to residential homes and its potential to detract from the overall character of the neighborhood. A childcare centre may be better suited in an area with better infrastructure or designated commercial spaces.

While I support the need for childcare services, I believe this particular location is not appropriate for such a development. I urge the council to reconsider this application and explore alternative locations that would better serve the community without negatively impacting local residents.

Thank you for considering my concerns.

It is a shame to see the beautiful Johnson and Johnson building be demolished.
Set back off Waterloo Road with its Georgian style architecture it has been a feature of Macquarie Park for many decades. I do hope that some effort was put into trying to keep the facade and build up and around it. Given the cost of the demolition of over $16 million and all the trees, the offices, the warehouse, the carparks etc it is assumed that something very big is going into this site.

I have lived in this area for a long time and am very familiar with the local situation. There are many factors here that make it unsuitable for building a kindergarten.

01 Traffic safety hazards:
Rutledge street is the Busiest main road in EASTWOOD, It has high traffic volume, I have personally witnessed frequent accidents happening on this road. Picking up and dropping off children may add to the danger, especially during peak hours.

02 Poor air quality:
Air pollution near main roads is often higher, with vehicle emissions and dust negatively impacting children's health, particularly their respiratory systems.

03 Noise pollution:
Busy roads are often accompanied by high noise levels from honking and engine sounds, which can disturb children's learning and rest, leading to increased stress.

04 Inconvenient access:
Parents might frequently have to cross the busy main road to drop off and pick up their children, contributing to traffic congestion and increasing risks for pedestrians and cyclists.

05 Unsuitable environment for children's activities:
The area near a busy road often lacks green spaces and safe outdoor play areas, making it unsuitable for children’s physical activities and outdoor development.

06 Difficulty in emergency services:
In case of emergencies such as fires or medical issues, busy roads may delay the arrival of rescue vehicles, slowing down response times.

07 Impact on educational quality:
Constant noise and air pollution can disrupt children’s concentration and learning, potentially lowering the quality of education.

08 Increased stress for parents and staff:
The congested traffic environment can add extra stress for both parents and kindergarten staff, particularly during drop-off and pick-up times, increasing daily anxiety.

Here are some key reasons for choosing a suitable location to build a kindergarten:
01 Safe traffic environment:
Areas with low traffic flow, especially away from major roads and busy streets, reduce the risk of accidents, ensuring safe entry and exit for parents and children.
02 Quiet environment:
Locations away from noise sources such as busy roads or factories help create a quiet atmosphere for learning and resting, enhancing children's concentration and well-being.
03 Good air quality:
Areas with fresh air are ideal for kindergartens, as children's respiratory systems are more vulnerable, and clean air supports their health and growth.
04 Sufficient outdoor play space:
Ample green areas or safe outdoor play spaces allow children to engage in more outdoor activities, promoting physical health and social development.
05 Convenient but not congested transportation:
Adequate public transportation or parking facilities make it easy for parents to drop off and pick up children without causing traffic congestion or safety issues.
06 Easy access to emergency services:
Locations where emergency vehicles like ambulances and fire trucks can quickly reach in case of emergencies ensure the safety of the children.
07 Community support and family-friendly environment:
Building in areas with a high concentration of families and strong community bonds encourages positive interaction between parents and the kindergarten, fostering a supportive environment for children's growth and education.

These factors help ensure that the kindergarten is built in a location that supports children's safety, health, learning, and development.

I am writing to submit my objection to the development application for the construction of a childcare facility at 56 Rutledge St, Eastwood, NSW 2122.

1. Environmental Significance of Trees: The property is home to several mature pine trees that contribute greatly to the natural environment and the local streetscape. These trees are not only aesthetically valuable but also play a crucial role in maintaining the ecological balance of the area. They are natural habitats to a couple of possums and various pieces of local birds. Any construction that threatens their preservation would have a detrimental impact on the community’s natural heritage.

2. Architectural and Heritage Concerns: The house located at 56 Rutledge St was built in 1940 and is an excellent example of Federation-style architecture. Its high ceilings and unique historical character are irreplaceable features that contribute to the charm and identity of the neighbourhood. Furthermore, the adjacent building is heritage-listed, and the proposed development may not align with the strict guidelines typically required for construction near heritage sites.

3. Traffic and Safety Issues: Rutledge St is already heavily trafficked, and the speed of vehicles poses a significant safety risk to children and pedestrians. The introduction of a childcare centre would likely exacerbate traffic congestion, particularly during peak drop-off and pick-up times, further endangering the safety of local residents, especially young children.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I trust that you will take these objections into account during your assessment process.

Sincerely,

This is a densely populated residential area, already impacted by heavy traffic congestion via both Epping & Vimiera roads, especially in morning and afternoon peak hours.
The air quality is also under stress from all the carbon generated by these high volume traffic flows.
We do not need to allow " Backyard " 9 Sqm or any other sized buildings" for Business /Commercial Trading Purposes", within a strict residential zoning, which will not only increase Traffic Flows and congestion but also introduce various Cooking smells into our neighbourhood.
Approval of this proposed application will only create a precedent for further households to lodge similar applications, not to mention the disputes that will follow between neighbours due to various cooking smells and odours.

I note that demolition commenced well before this DA was submitted and assume not approved yet.

A mature tree on Talavera Rd has died as a result of this development. I am concerned about the developers public statements regarding environment, but not demonstrating it. I would like to know what advanced tree planting is being undertaken in "public" area between buildings to compensate for the tree loss.

We live at 6 Hatton Street, this block of units are only 5 units. To have a construction this size at the back of the building will totally close off all natural light, Sun and daylight. Thats a real health issue. Besides it will damage the base of our building when on such a small land 3 underground carpark levels are constructed. There is very small space between these buildings already. I don't believe this land is suitable for high rise. If our building is affected at all we will seek insurance claims. Please think of the surrounding. And as said before we have not been informed formally, only by word of mouth. Please INSPECT the area and you will see for yourself, also ask the neighbours, knock on doors and they will tell you that they already have problems with the land, water leaks, cracks in walls. etc. This will only make it worse for everyone else surrounding this construction.

Why does a tree, which does not seem to block access to the property in question, need to be removed from council property?
In recent years Ryde Council has actively been planting street trees, to replace the loss of vegetation and habitat for wildlife, that has been decimated by the clearing of housing blocks of land for redevelopment.
If removal of trees on 'nature strips' is accepted, does this mean anyone can apply to have the council planted trees removed?

I am really disappointed to see another apartment block along Victoria Road. Congestion on Victoria Road is soul destroying and lack of parking available in the shopping area is
even more so.

Whether it is the Govt. Councils or both which allow these structures without any consideration to the degradation of lifestyle and ambience of the suburb, it is a clear
indication that one or other or both of them are guilty of wilful blindness to the voices of its citizens.

We do not need any more apartment blocks and I am sorry if this development goes ahead as I do not support it.

I support the application.

Village Days is a quality venue, is not noisy at all, adds a new fun dimension to Gladesville and the hours are very reasonable.

The application should be approved. Village Days adds amenity to our local community. Being in an industrial estate it does not create disruption to local residents.

I agree with Russ.
Totally support the application.
Village Days has a great vibe!

This application should be supported. Village Days has brought a welcome new offering to the area and we should support this to help them given how tough business can be in food and beverage industry. There is a great atmosphere there and we are lucky to have this artisan brewer operating in premises that buffer from residential neighbours better than alternative locations would.

My concern with this application is the illumination of the sign. If it is dim, does not light up the immediate area, and simply allows a potential customer to see a sign in the dark - there's no real issue. However, the submission assessment notes that no, the illumination would not detract from the amenity of any residence citing existing street lights. The street lights point downwards to illuminate the road and footpath whereas the sign will point horizontally which would illuminate the adjacent buildings and landscape affecting not only the residents in direct line of sight, but also other residents that may have the exterior of adjacent buildings and trees reflecting the light. There is no proposed curfew, which may impact people trying to sleep if a sign is lighting up their bedroom at night. Although there is existing lighting in the area, adding more lighting will still increase the ambient brightness and light pollution of the area which could impact residents living nearby.

I would like this development to be expedited by all means possible so that the surrounding community can have the 506 bus stop reinstated outside this plot. The whole bus-travelling local community is inconvenienced until this private development is completed.

The number of trees that will be cut down for this "Over" development is astonishing. This proposal is very bad news if you are a local bird or other creature. I hope council thinks very hard about this and notices the other trees that are dying for no good reason near by.

Removal of basement is very concerning as parking is at a premium in Meadowbank. Also Meadowbank is already over crowded with too many apartments, rubbish and dog poo along the foreshore and street, unfortunately renters who do not really care much for the area they rent in as they don’t have a vested interest. Adding this place will worsen the community.

Warren and Lydia, have council check records for 1 Crescent Ave, during building a large underground garage was excavated, the house above ground is two storeys = 3.
Council also approved two full windows in the duplex facing/looking into two of my bedrooms deemed illegal by state and council laws. RCC does what suits.

I agree with Warren Smith. Not enough thought is going into these developments in Ryde. Rules are being disregarded and not enough community consultation.

City of Ryde is currently struggling to achieve the NSW Government target for green cover. The trees proposed to be removed are significant. A suggested condition of the design and approval should included planting of substantial trees to compensate for the removal of the existing trees so there is not a loss of green cover. This will benefit the occupants of the completed project by providing shade and keeping the homes cooler. Selection of trees should consider safety during storms so selection of species should avoid trees that lose branches eg. not Gum Trees

This is a normal residential R2 zoned address. Under R2 zoning rules basements are not allowed. Allowing the illegal basement to proceed is effectively allowing a 3 storey house. This proposed design does not match the typical houses in the area which are predominately single storey.

Currently in this location is a Ford and Hyundai car dealership. I recently visited this car sales business and in subsequent communication raised this development with the salesman. Staff do not know anything about this development so it appears their boss hasn't even given them the courtesy of advising them this is coming. I won't be buying a car off this business if that is the way they treat their staff.