An unremarkable proposal overall except for the aspect that seems to pave the parking area.
Responds positively to the streetscape.
Fence proposed is context responsive and avoids any risks of dominance in the streetscape.
If fence height is below 1200mm, the regular proposed use may be excessively dominant in the streetscape - positive response to context requires subservience to the streetscape.
Will slightly reduce on street parking but given emerging character, and the current local parking controls, the impacts would be unremarkable.
While I anticipate some people may be disappointed with the loss of one on street parking spot for their households or visitors use, no right or entitlement attaches to that spot for the benefit of anybody -- indeed any gradual cumulative reduction in on street parking bays would reduce vehicle congestion in the street.
I have concerns about the proposal reducing site permeability and that a large paved area may:
Increase inundation of adjacent sites during heavy rain,
Alter the direction, velocity and volume of overland water flows,
Increase light reflectivity which will adversely impact surrounding amenity at night.
Would like to see more serious contemplation of maintaining same, or some, continuing permeability in the on site parking area.
Would like to see materials and colours that avoid excessive light reflectivity.
Overall I have no objection to the proposed use, just requesting conditions added for environment and amenity.
